![]() ![]() They all do acceptable work at a minimum. The 9 takes a larger photo it seems, but with worse low light performance.īottom line, you're not gonna go wrong with any modern camera made by any modern manufacture. Casually reading around quickly, it doesn't seem like there is a lot of big differences between the two. I'm gonna assume since it came out after the g7, it's got something better the g7 doesn't have. I'm not an expert on this stuff, so maybe I'm speaking more out of the personal experience than expertise, so take my advice here with a big side of salt.Īs for the gx9 - never used it, and sadly, not familiar with it. Those older glasses, depending on make and model, are known for sharpness that, in terms of modern lenses, requires much higher price tags. I've never used zoom for macro purposes really because of the usual minimum focus distance issues. I'm not gonna sit here and argue about DXO ratings. I know it can zoom in farther but will that work better for up close macro work? What are you doing that you need to be so far away for to get something out of the 140mm end frequently enough to make it worth your while?įor me, personally, that long range stuff has never been of much value. Now, if you're in a controlled environment, I'm sure it's fine, but as soon as you try and take something in low light, that 3.5 won't cut it. That 3.5-5.6, to me, is not enough light. I picked up the 40-150 kit lens for like $50 and that's the only other lens I've used - not including stuff for photography. In all but two gigs, I have never had to use any other lens. ![]() I have not worked with this lens, but I own the Panasonic 12-35. Ive ran across several videos suggesting the 14-140mm lens being the best all-around lens for this camera. I've got better equipment, but I keep going back to the g7 to the point, I'm probably not getting a pocket 4k, but a gh5 instead, when the time comes. Sure, other cameras have better bells and whistles, but not for $400. Nothing touches what it does for what it cost. Just my opinion, but the G7 is, hands down, the best pound for pound camera for the price. You can buy all that stuff on ebay for less and frankly, you won't need or use most of it. There's a $50ish dollar rode mic that's perfect.Īre the tripods included with some of the camera bundles any good?Īll those camera bundles on amazon (making an assumption here) are shit. It will be all manual focus, but the g7 has peaking and you can do some great detail work.Īny recommendations on a good inexpensive ext mic? If you're looking to go macro cheaper than the electronic options, get an old 50mm cannon fd, or some m42 mount (helios 44) and get some extension tubes and an adapter. Those kit lenses are pretty soft overall. Will the kit lens be able to zoom in enough to show good detail on coins or will I need some kind of macro lens? Not sure how that works if it's directly to something that is the recorder itself. Looking for a camera that has clean hdmi outputĪs I understand it, when you use hdmi, the camera doesn't allow you to view the live recording so it needs some sort of external solution. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |